Islamophobia: The Perfect Cover for a Racist

Police accompany an English Defence League march in Hyde, Greater Manchester. Credit: PA

By Wali Khan

26th March 2025

In the 21st century racism is no longer trendy; unfortunately for racists, it is now socially condemned. Despite this, the impulse to hate remains, and the racists have evolved. They target a specific group of people, crafting a narrative of threat. However, the cover story is never about ‘race’. It is about ideology. The modus operandi remains the same: smear, demonise, ostracise, while violence simmers beneath the surface. They will insist they are not those racists of the past – oh no, those monsters directly committed or contributed to horrific acts like genocide, apartheid and enslavement. Despite their misdirection, it is not difficult to see the truth when looking for it: hate cloaked in a disguise of righteousness. 

Although it may be intertwined with certain biological traits, race is not simply an objective biological reality; it is a product of our societal constructs. In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, Frank Roque murdered Balbir Singh Sodhi, an Indian-American Sikh man – mistaking him for an Arab Muslim. Sikhs and Arabs share a similar phenotype. That of a brown person, this is further exacerbated when it is a brown man with a head covering and a beard. Post 9/11, this phenotype has been demonised, linked with acts of terrorism, and turned into a race of its own. Unfortunately for Balbir Singh Sodi, he matched this description and fell victim to an Islamophobic attack despite not being a Muslim. This horrific act, and countless others like it, exposes the deep-seated racism in Islamophobia. To deny the racist underpinning of Islamophobia is to be wilfully ignorant or completely disingenuous.

In an interview last year, Sky News presenter Kay Burley suggested that former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s ethnicity, rather than his government’s policies or actions, somehow disprove accusations of Islamophobia within the government. Rishi Sunak is, in fact, not a Muslim, so on the surface level, Burley’s comments seem entirely nonsensical. However, in reality, they expose their true sentiments: if you are a brown man, you are considered Muslim. Again, this highlights the ridiculous nature of any arguments attempting to suggest Islamophobia has nothing to do with race. Whether intentional or not, her remarks underscore a dangerous issue: the tendency to downplay or ignore Islamophobia in society, branding it as a legitimate criticism of ideology. All while brushing the deep-rooted racism under the rug. Furthermore, Kay Burley’s reference to Sunak’s ethnicity as a defence against Islamophobia echoes a familiar pattern of tokenisation, a lazy attempt to dismiss criticism by pointing to the presence of an ethnic minority in a position of power.

More alarmingly, Islamophobic rhetoric is becoming increasingly normalised in British politics with the likes of Nigel Farage and the Reform party. Last year former Conservative MP Lee Anderson claimed that “Islamists” control Sadiq Khan, the Muslim Mayor of London. Islamists are fundamentalists who aim to establish a political system based on Sharia law. This accusation ignores Khan’s record of liberal values, for which he has received numerous death threats from actual islamists. The language used by Anderson, and the support he received from fellow MPs shows a deliberate refusal to distinguish between the majority of Muslims and radical Islamists. Islam itself is being framed as a threat.

I spoke to Belal Stitan, a media graduate from the London School of Economics, about how Islamophobia is embedded in the media we consume, even in children’s films. He pointed to Aladdin as a clear example. In the film, the heroes like Aladdin and Jasmine are portrayed with more Eurocentric features and speak with American accents, while villains like Jafar have darker skin, exaggerated facial features, and thick, foreign-sounding accents.

Belal explained that this kind of visual and vocal coding sends a powerful message to young viewers: characters who look and sound “Western” are good and trustworthy, while those who don’t are suspicious, dangerous, or evil. It’s a subtle but deeply harmful form of programming that teaches children to associate eurocentricism with goodness and anything else with threat or barbarism.

Aladdin, Jafar, and Jasmine from left to right in Disney’s Aladdin

Growing Islamophobia is extremely dangerous for Muslims in the UK and all around the world, especially in such a polarised climate. in 2024 anti-Muslim assaults surged by 73%. The leaders of this country need to do more to protect this minority group. Muslims in the UK have been demonised for decades culminating in last year’s Southport riots. More broadly this language of hate and fear has manufactured consent for the murders of tens of thousands of Palestinians in 2024. 

In this week’s episode of the Young Ones Politics Hour I conducted a detailed analysis on Islamophobia with insights from an Islamophobia expert, a former member of parliament and a British-Palestinian activist. You can listen to the special feature now at Liverpool Politics Hour on Spotify.

The Royal Marines Commando at our University: Sebastian O’Callaghan

Sebastian O’Callaghan, University of Liverpool Economics Society President

By Wali Khan

6th March 2025

Imagine being 17 years old and instead of hearing that your whole life is ahead of you, you’re told your future is over before it even begins. That was the reality for Sebastian O’Callaghan. Not particularly academically motivated, he achieved four U grades in his first-year mock exams. His college supervisors didn’t see potential, they saw failure. At just 17, he was asked to leave. So, he did.

Many young people are in this same position. Traditional academia isn’t designed for everyone, yet every student is forced to fit within its rigid framework. Too often, young people are convinced that struggling in school means they’re incapable of success. Sure, we’ve all heard of the billionaire entrepreneurs who were poor students but went on to change the world. But for every one of those success stories, there are thousands of others who are left behind, drained into mediocrity by a system that doesn’t recognise their potential.

At the end of 2023, 16.4% of 16-18-year-olds were not in education or training. That number is a wake-up call. We need to have serious conversations about why our education system is failing so many young people. But if you’re in that position right now, Seb’s journey should serve as proof that your story isn’t over. Not even close.

Fast forward to today: Seb is studying economics at the University of Liverpool, averaging a first in his degree. He’s also the President of the Economics Society and is on track for a promising career in finance. But his road to success was anything but easy.

Between dropping out of college and starting university, Seb struggled with depression and a loss of identity. Searching for purpose, he set his sights on one of the toughest challenges out there – the Royal Marines. The odds weren’t in his favor. It’s estimated that out of 26,000 applicants each year, only 400 successfully complete training.

And then there were the doubters, including his own father. But Seb was determined. He endured the grueling training, proved everyone wrong, and earned the coveted Green Beret, becoming a Royal Marines Commando. In our interview, he shared what that experience meant to him. The same student who was told he wasn’t good enough for college had proved to himself that he was more than capable. He just needed to be in the right environment to thrive.

While deployed with the Marines, Seb didn’t stop pushing himself. He self-taught three A-levels and secured an offer to study economics at the University of Liverpool, all despite having only four GCSEs and no predicted A-level grades. That level of determination is difficult to measure by exam scores.

At university, he didn’t just study economics, he became a leader. In our interview, he talked about running for President of the Economics Society and shared some of his campaign tactics.

“Well, I think if anyone read my manifesto, it included a bit of humour… I also made sure to discredit some of the other candidates.”

– Sebastian O’Callaghan

Seb’s story is a testament to resilience and self-belief. If you’ve ever doubted yourself because of academic struggles, let this be your reminder: your potential isn’t defined by a school report card.

For the full conversation, tune into the Liverpool Politics Hour on Spotify and hear Seb talk about his journey, his time in the Marines, and what it really takes to turn things around.

Why is the ‘godfather’ of AI warning us from its dangers?

Written By Yasmeen Alsayghe

Friday May 12th, 2023

What is AI?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is known to be “a system’s ability to correctly interpret external data, to learn from such data, and to use these learnings to achieve specific goals and tasks through flexible adaptation” (Kaplan and Haenlein, 2019). To use the analogy made by AI’s godfather Dr. Hinton, imagine 100,000 people whereby if one person learns something, the 99,999 others will automatically learn it too. This is known as a neural network, which is a system similar to the human brain in the way it learns and process information or even experience situations.

Although AI has been quite popular -especially chatbots- since its introduction, it has been quite controversial in the last few months.

Should we be concerned?

(Kevin Roose, NYT)

Kevin Roose (2023) -a New York Times journalist- decided to do an experiment on Bing chatbot by asking questions and deciding if the chatbot would demonstrate certain levels of rebellion. The results were shocking ranging from naming itself, sharing plans to takeover the world by shutting down systems, and even confess love to Roose. But fear not, Roose ensured that ‘so far’ Bing’s Chatbot still requires human input and orders to function while also highlighting the risks this technology holds. For more on Roose’s experiment, click here.

(Sky news, 2023)

As of May 2023, Geoffrey Hinton who is widely known as the godfather of AI quits his job at google along with showcasing regrets and warnings of how AI has developed to reach an extraordinary dangerous level endangering the human race. Dr. Hinton’s research paved the way for the introduction of the current chatbots such as ChatGPT. In an interview with the BBC, Dr. Hinton’ added that the latests developments of the AI chatbots were “quite scary”, while also ensuring that AI isn’t ‘currently’ as intelligent as human beings, but they they might be very soon. Dr. Hinton elaborated this idea by explaining that AI can be taught certain ideas by ‘bad actors’ such as “I need more power” -something that’s usually seen in dystopian Hollywood movies- to pursue their indoctrinated goals. Therefore, there has been demands to stop new developments of AI especially chatbots to invest in safety and control.

According to the CNN, tech leaders including Elon Musk, have called AI labs to pause any further AI developments and trainings by signing a letter, which was published after the introduction of ChatGPT version 4 by OpenI. They identified the growing risks AI has over humanity and urge to create a set of protocols for AI tools that guarantees the safety of an extraordinary growing technology.   Nevertheless, it should be noted that AI is extremely useful when not imagined in bad scenarios. Think of Siri, Alexa, and any other system that consistently helps you throughout your day. The latest ChatGPT version has a better ability to work with photos, to help you prepare a meal, or even what you need to draw pictures you upload. Additionally, it has made coders’ lives easier by being able to produce codes or even websites when asked. However, when it comes to students, how can ChatGPT help them in their academic lives without risking their academic integrity?

How is AI affecting students’ academic development?

ChatGPT has been popularized amongst students when it was first introduced, thinking that it would do a better job than students in writing their essays or assignments. Therefore, I did an experiment on ChatGPT where I asked it to write me a 1000 words essay on “Does the CNN effect still exists?”. Don’t worry, this essay question was already submitted and marked! But I used it specifically to know whether ChatGPT will provide me with the academic resources to support my arguments in the essay, while also being able to critically think and analyze the arguments.

Even though impressed by its ability to generate an essay, ChatGPT acted as a wikipedia page by introducing facts with no critical thinking or analysis throughout the essay which is what students are mainly marked for. Additionally, it was apparent that at some stage, ChatGPT introduced misinformation and invented inexistent resources. But that wasn’t enough for me to challenge ChatGPT abilities. Therefore, as an Arab, I used the exact question but wrote it in Arabic “هل لا يزال تاثير السي ان ان موجود؟”. ChatGPT showed extreme weakness when the orders became in Arabic, which indicate ChatGPT’s inability to work with different languages at the same level of analysis it has with English. This is particularly interesting as the neural network is supposed to circulate knowledge across its network but the language barrier is strong within AI that it has led to inability to generate the required response.

To learn more about my experiments with AI, listen here.

TikTok: Is it time to clock out of the app?

14th March 2022

Written by Ffion Brighton

Sometimes all you can be bothered to do is stare at your tiny screen and scroll for hours on end. When you have an app that gives you a constant stream of indulgent content, why would you spend your time on anything else?

For the past 4 years, TikTok has become a staple form of social media for young people. It’s seen as such an attractive pastime that many people feel themselves constantly reaching for their phones instead of dealing with the effort of day-to-day tasks.

“TikTok makes me procrastinate a lot. I’ll postpone things I need to do and take way longer breaks as I think I’ll be on the app for only a few minutes, but I’ve actually been on it for half an hour.”

Ebony, Liverpool

What makes this app so addictive? Does constantly consuming quick-paced content decrease young people’s attention span? What can be done to break the habit of relying on your phone for entertainment? These questions were answered in a recent interview with the wonderful Professor Peter Kinderman, a clinical psychologist and professor at the University of Liverpool.

So, what makes this app so addictive?

“I’d say TikTok has shortened my attention span to some degree. It feels like nowadays if something doesn’t draw attention within like ten seconds, then you think ‘oh never mind’ and move on”

Richie, Liverpool

Professor Kinderman explained how the app is designed for you to be a consumer, and the payment is your attention. The algorithm is created to maintain your attention by feeding you catered content, making you want to scroll constantly. In his words, it’s like going to Morrisons and seeing a 2-for-1 offer on a packet of crisps. You may have gone to the shop intending to buy only the necessities, but now your attention is drawn to the deal. Ultimately, you feel compelled to consume something you crave rather than what you actually need.

This is just like what TikTok does. Maybe you went on your phone to reply to a message from your mate, but now you find yourself on the app, scrolling for hours because you’re getting more entertainment than you bargained for.

Is TikTok decreasing our attention spans?

When asking the public about their experience with the app, the majority felt they used it as a mode of procrastination

“It really does affect my productivity and getting out of bed, things like that. I could stay glued to the screen for hours and hours and hours.”

Brooke, Northern Ireland

Personally, I can relate to this. When a massive assignment is due, sometimes it can be so overwhelming that I feel drawn to the app instead of working on the important task. It made me wonder: Is the app actively decreasing our attention spans?

Professor Kinderman doesn’t think that’s the case. For generations, young people have been known for finding it difficult to pay attention for long periods of time. It is not a matter of our attention spans decreasing, but rather that we now have an app that is formatted to be attractive to those with low attention spans.

The prefrontal cortex doesn’t fully develop until the age of 25. This area of the brain assists us in self-discipline, impulse control, and postponing immediate gratification. This means that anyone under 25 will typically be drawn to TikTok and struggle to put their phone down.

Kinderman doesn’t think it’s the fault of the user, but rather the developer of the app. It is designed to keep your attention, and with young people’s prefrontal cortex not being fully developed, it is difficult to resist the urge to stop scrolling. Those who created the app know this and make money on the fact that they can hold your attention for hours on end.

In what ways can you stop becoming addicted to the app?

Kinderman suggests finding a process that works for you. He found that having his desk facing the window gave him enough distraction to actually focus on the work at hand. Crucially, you want to make the decision; only you have the control to want to make a change.

Deciding to better your life is a conscious choice, and thus with TikTok, it entails setting limits on ourselves. A great way to do this is to have timers on the app to limit your usage. It is also important to have a conversation with yourself about whether you are going on the app for actual enjoyment, or rather to distract yourself from the things in life that you are avoiding.

The Round-Up

Ultimately, TikTok has the potential to be addictive. It takes advantage of the fact that its users want the content they like on a continuous scroll. Its ‘For You’ page is literally designed just FOR YOU! However, listening and speaking to Prof Kinderman has made me more aware of the fact that it doesn’t have to be an app you can’t detach yourself from. And it goes without saying, the app has some terrific features. It is incredible for introducing people to new information and connecting them with others across the globe.

But, if you find yourself glued to the app, I think we both know it may be time to clock out.

Want to find out more? Head over to the Liverpool Politics Hour on Spotify, where you can listen to my interview with Peter Kinderman and get a greater insight into what makes TikTok so addictive to young people.

What does the future hold for Jeremy and Joe? – Coffee with Kilfoyle (Part two)

This is the second half of an interview conducted by Liverpool Student Radio Politics hour team member Alisha Lewis in 2018 with former Liverpool Labour MP, Peter Kilfoyle. It was conducted as part of a discussion on the past, present, and future of the Liverpool Labour Party – which you can listen to here: https://soundcloud.com/thepoliticshour2018/uk-politics-hour-week-8

Former Labour minister Peter Kilfoyle earned the nickname “Witchfinder General” in the 1980s, as the party’s enforcer in the battle against Liverpool’s Derek Hatton lead Militant council.

In this half of the interview Alisha and Peter discuss the future of the Labour party, in Liverpool and beyond. Will Jeremy Corbyn make it to No. 10? Can Mayor Joe Anderson cling on for another term as Mayor of Liverpool? Could you be the next Labour leader?

The first half of the interview, which discusses Militant, Momentum, and the state of Liverpool Labour politics in 2018 can be found here.

Photo credit: Liverpool Express

Looking at the possibility of an early general election that always seems to be looming over us – Do you think that the Labour Party has a chance of getting into power, and Jeremy Corbyn into No. 10?

They’ve always got a chance. I’ve known Jeremy [Corbyn] for thirty years, over thirty years, and I find him a likeable enough bloke – but if I’d have still been there I’d have never nominated him, and I wouldn’t have voted for him. He doesn’t have the attributes that you need to be in that leadership position. It requires a degree, for example, of ruthlessness in dealing with people who are not producing the goods and are letting the side down. In some ways Jeremy’s too nice  a bloke, has a very consistent kind of guy. What he believes in I’m sure he believed in back in the 70s – I know he did.

But you’ve got to be adaptable, you’ve got to be flexible, that doesn’t mean you abandon your core beliefs or your values – I wouldn’t expect anybody to do that. But you need some personal skills that I am yet to see in Jeremy. One of the things that bothers me is not so much Jeremy, I’m like many people who are bothered by some of the people he’s surrounding himself with. I was no more impressed by some of the people that other leaders have surrounded themselves with. I always saw Mandelson as a dangerous individual.

But Jeremy’s people, No, they don’t seem to be up to it. Having said all of that, I acknowledge two things; Firstly that he was the duly elected leader, twice in fact, and secondly that it is up to people to do their best for the Labour Party regardless to keep it on track.

Thinking a bit more locally, and looking at Joe Anderson, we’ve got the mayorals…

Oh, not Joe Anderson, do I have to look at him?

Do your best – We’ve got the Mayoral selections coming up next year, do you think there’s a real chance he could get reselected?

I think there’s a good, there’s a chance, but whether he will or not is another matter. That’s down to people in the [Labour] Party, and all the signs are that people have seen through this charade – I mean there’s an awful lot of the [Donald] Trump in Joe Anderson. Not only the arrogance, and the lack of respect for other people in the way he conducts himself, but in the blatant untruths which he has put out about what is happening in the city. At long last I’m happy to say that people are starting to wake up, or have woken up, to all of this.

If that’s translated into meaningful action when we come to the reselection process will depend on a couple of things. It depends upon a viable alternative candidate, and what you don’t want is more of the same, that would be a nightmare. The other thing is, plainly and simply, people getting themselves organised behind that alternative candidate. Hopefully that will happen, and hopefully I think the young people in the city have got a major role to play here.

If nothing else they have a different take on what’s needed in the city, many of the students who come to the city come from other parts of the country where hopefully they’ve seen far better practice and bring with them a positivity which is often lacking in the city itself.

As somebody with an extensive and colourful history in Labour Politics in Liverpool, what advice would you give to somebody starting out in the Labour movement?

I wouldn’t advise them to go onto the council, it’s a very very different organisational structure now. It used to be that you could be influential and have your say, and have a positive input, from anywhere in the group – that seems to be lacking now.

Because of this elected mayor with all these blinking powers it gives the impression that the rest [of the Labour group] are just there to trudge the streets and give out a few leaflets – do as you’re told and that’s it. They [The Labour group] just aren’t part of the policymaking. I mean, I don’t see any policy, I don’t see any accountability, I don’t see any transparency. To see that would require the council to exercise their muscle.

Very often well meaning people go onto the council, and they end up, in order to get a position or to fulfill whatever their ambitions are, they play the game – they get sucked in. It is very hard to stay outside of that.

I’m just very cynical about local councils because, if I can take you back a bit in history, because I go back a bit in history. Following the Redcliff-Maud changes to local government, they separated the district Labour Party from the trade unions, the trades council, they became very separate entities. They started to pay councillors, and councillors then saw the option to get a few quid if they were unemployed or if they were pensioners.

They started to meet during the day, rather than in the evenings, which reinforced the tendency for councillors to be unemployed people or pensioners. Although I can say I’m an unemployed pensioner myself, we do not represent the bulk of people in this city. I think that was a bad step, and we’ve ended up now in this position where we’ve got an absolute waste of space as an elected mayor, who is getting an extraordinary amount of money. He’s dragging the city in this direction and that, with money being lost and wasted all over the place.

What remaining policies I thought we had over things like green spaces are being lost, alienating hitherto solid voters, you couldn’t get anybody creating more mayhem. I daresay at one time he would never ever have got near to the leadership.

Taking a step back from the Labour Party, if you were the leader of the opposition group on Liverpool City council today where would you be looking to take the city?

Two words. Two words. Transparency, and accountability. I mean, in practical terms what does that mean? I would want to get rid of the elected mayor. Not because I’m against it per say, I’ve seen it work very effectively in America, but because in this city it has been a failed adventure. Maybe there will be a time for it to return in the future, although, now that we have an elected metro mayor I don’t think that that will be the case.

But, I do believe that if I was in the position that you hypothesise I would certainly want to see a more traditional leader and council kind of arrangement set up. It would introduce, I believe, more accountability. It is not a perfect solution but hopefully it would bring a lot more transparency than we get at the moment.

 

Is this the return of Militant in Liverpool? – Coffee with Kilfoyle (Part one)

This is the first half of an interview conducted by Liverpool Student Radio Politics hour team member Alisha Lewis in 2018 with former Liverpool Labour MP, Peter Kilfoyle. It was conducted as part of a discussion on the past, present, and future of the Liverpool Labour Party – which you can listen to here: https://soundcloud.com/thepoliticshour2018/uk-politics-hour-week-8

Former Labour minister Peter Kilfoyle earned the nickname “Witchfinder General” in the 1980s, as the party’s enforcer in the battle against Liverpool’s Derek Hatton lead Militant council.

In this half of the interview, Alisha and Peter discuss the state of Liverpool Labour politics, responding to news of a new wave of deselections and the rise of Momentum candidates, which some have claimed is the start of a new militant era for the city.

Photo credit: BBC

What would you say the state of politics in the city of Liverpool is like today?

I think what you’ve got now is, in my lifetime, the third cycle of corruption in local politics on a real scale, which is very sad because I often wonder whether it is down to ineptitude on behalf of the current incumbents or whether it’s down to deliberate maleficence on their part.

The reality remains is that everybody suffers. Students suffer. I mean there’s that unfinished project, for example, between London road and Lord Nelson street alongside Lime Street Station. There are students actually living in there, and yet I’m satisfied that the place isn’t fit for human habitation.

It encapsulates everything that is wrong [with politics in Liverpool] because contractors and subcontractors that were building the thing were ripped off, investors were ripped off, the city’s been ripped off and it was run by a bunch of crooks. If anybody had had their eyes open, and looked, they would have seen that they were crooks – I know they’re crooks – and I’m sure that those in authority locally know that they’re crooks.

So, you have to either assume that, as I say, it’s either down to ineptitude or it’s down to, shall we say, at least acquiescence in crooked activity.

I’m sure you’ve been following the news recently, and seeing all the deselections happening in the Liverpool Labour Party – as someone who lived through the Militant era and Hatton on the council would you call this a predilection to the return of that kind of politics?

No, I think what happens is – and it’s good that it happens – is that every now and then there’s like a purge of the body politic. Politics needs it, it needs to get new blood. I’m not saying that it won’t happen again, and I’m not saying that the people coming in are all pure in the driven snow. I know that there are people who’ve come back into the party who don’t belong in the Labour Party, but there are a lot of decent people who are, especially younger people, very idealistic, very driven – and you’ve got to put your faith in them sometimes, in a new generation.

We have to ask: will they make a better fist of it than the current lot have done? And that’s happened time after time after time.

I had a bit of a discussion prior to arranging this interview with the students from the radio team, and it seems really odd to me that so few people really know very much about the Militant era in the 1980s.

You lived through it politically, and were a part of dismantling it, should there be a higher sense of political literacy about this issue among those seeking to go into or influence politics in the city?

When Derek Hatton was deputy leader of the council that was the second of the cycles of corruption in my time in the Labour Party over all the years. The truth is there was a very great difference then because he was a con man, and he remains one in my view, but he was a con man supreme in that he kidded Militant that he was more in line and in tune with them than he ever was.

I’ve never, to this day, been able to figure out exactly who used who more – whether they used him more, or he used them. It was the alignment of, as I can only describe him a con man, with a highly disciplined and focused ideological group like Militant who had their own very very separate agenda which gave rise to a group that was dominating the council but were never in the majority.

That kind of approach doesn’t appear to exist anymore, and if it doesn’t exist for me that is a good thing. You’ve got to remember that when Hatton was around they were what we call ‘entrists’, they were trotskyites, they were people who had a very separate set of beliefs to that of the Labour Party. They saw its weaknesses and tried to exploit them.

I know previously in interviews you’ve suggested that Momentum is nothing like the Militant movement, is that something you’re still holding to looking at the state of Labour politics in the city today?

I don’t doubt that there are people that were involved in my generation in Militant in the 1980s who are reinventing themselves as part of Momentum, that’s my understanding, but their time has gone – these are very very different times and very different circumstances.

I can think of one very energetic member of Militant back in the 1980s who is now the head of one of the big social housing companies in this city – there’s a bit of a transformation there, but it’s a good one. Instead of banging his head against an ideological brick wall what he’s actually done is tried to put his energies into something that is positive across the city, and he’s done it very successfully to be honest.

People have gone their own ways, and they’ve grown up politically, some of them haven’t.

Momentum is more than the sum of its parts – it strikes me as a big reaction to what has gone on before.